VERY OCCASIONAL ANNOUNCEMENTS APPEAR BELOW

October 1, 2024: A fantastic publication day for THE SEQUEL, began with a great New York Times review (“Sequels are notoriously tricky. Even the characters in “The Sequel” acknowledge it. ‘They’re never as good as the first book, are they?’ Well, this one is.”), moved on to a lovely Washington Post review by Maureen Corrigan (“readers of ‘The Sequel’ will find themselves rooting for the witty, ruthless Anna to win out over the predators, poseurs and ordinary mean folk who populate her mostly fallen universe. Like Patricia Highsmith’s Tom Ripley (inspiration for Ripley College) or Satan in Milton’s ‘Paradise Lost,’ Anna is a heinous devil who may shock and offend, but never bores.”), a Bibliophiles piece in the Boston Globe, a Best Books of October nod in People (“satirical, bookish suspense”) and finally the news that the novel had been selected as a Best Books of October. I also signed books around town and got to record an interview for the New York Times Book Review podcast with Gilbert Cruz, which meant that I entered the New York Times building for the first time in my life. (Native New Yorker here!) What a day!

This happened.

THE SEQUEL will be published on October 1st!

After the “insanely readable” (Stephen King) and “perfectly told” (Malcolm Gladwell)New York Times bestseller The Plot comes Jean Hanff Korelitz’s equally captivating new novel: The Sequel. 

Anna Williams-Bonner has taken care of business. That is to say, she’s taken care of her husband, bestselling novelist Jacob Finch Bonner, and laid to rest those anonymous accusations of plagiarism that so tormented him. Now she is living the contented life of a literary widow, enjoying her husband’s royalty checks in perpetuity, but for the second time in her life, a work of fiction intercedes, and this time it’s her own debut novel, The Afterword. After all, how hard can it really be to write a universally lauded bestseller?

But when Anna publishes her book and indulges in her own literary acclaim, she begins to receive excerpts of a novel she never expected to see again, a novel that should no longer exist. That it does means something has gone very wrong, and someone out there knows far too much: about her late brother, her late husband, and just possibly... Anna, herself. What does this person want and what are they prepared to do? She has come too far, and worked too hard, to lose what she values most: the sole and uncontested right to her own story. And she is, by any standard, a master storyteller.

With her signature wit and sardonic humor, Jean Hanff Korelitz gives readers an antihero to root for while illuminating and satirizing the world of publishing in this deliciously fun and suspenseful read.

THE PLOT was the Fallon Summer Reads winner in 2021

Exciting year end lists for 2022!

THE LATECOMER has been included in The New York Times’ 100 Books of the Year, CBS Sunday Morning/Favorite Novels of 2022, The New Yorker Magazine’s The Best Books of 2022, Washington Post’s 50 Best Fiction Books of 2022, and NPR’s Staff Picks/Best of 2022.

Nice to share this wonderful honor with my husband, who collaborated with Paul McCartney on the magnificent THE LYRICS. Thank you to People Magazine!

A television adaptation of THE LATECOMER will be developed by producers Kristen Campo (Campout Productions) and Bruna Papandrea (Made Up Stories). Read the announcement here.

A once in a lifetime photo taken by my daughter in front of Penn Station, after THE PLOT was named Amazon’s Number 3 book of the year!

Some news about the television adaptation of THE PLOT:

Multiple outlets are bidding on a buzzy limited series adaptation of the best-selling novel “The Plot” with Mahershala Ali attached to star for Endeavor Content.

Ali is a two-time Oscar winner, for 2017’s “Moonlight” and 2019’s “Green Book.” For TV, he starred in the third season of HBO’s “True Detective” in 2019 and was a regular on Netflix’s “Luke Cage” and “House of Cards.” He was featured in the 2020 HBO documentary special “Between the World and Me,” and he was a semi-regular last year on the Hulu comedy “Ramy.”

Thanks to THE GUARDIAN (UK) and Lisa Allardice for this great profile!

Screen Shot 2021-07-28 at 9.23.28 PM.png

I spoke to Sarah Silverman on her podcast, about THE UNDOING, adaptation, and the genius of Tevye.

“Meet the Makers” with Irish Repertory Theatre. Discussing THE DEAD, 1904 with Paul Muldoon, Ciaran O’Reilly, Nina Korelitz Matza and Liz Neumark

fullsizeoutput_6c53.jpg

10/24/19 It was such a thrill to interview Erica Jong for the Sharon Springs Poetry Festival last weekend. Here’s a write up from AllOtsego.com

10/22/19

As someone who’s written at some length about college admissions, I’ve followed the unfolding #VarsityBlues scandal with great interest, and I have some thoughts.

First, anyone who wants to truly understand the current admissions landscape should read Jerome Karabel’s THE CHOSEN: THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF ADMISSION AND EXCLUSION AT HARVARD, YALE, AND PRINCETON, as I did when I was writing ADMISSION. Looking at the current configuration without being able to place it in a historical context is not useful.

Second, colleges should discontinue designated admits and recruiting for sports that are generally not offered in public schools: Equestrian, sailing, golf, skiing, lacrosse, etc. (Though these sports can certainly still be played, even at the college level.)

Third, legacy applicants (and their parents) are not the villains of this story. Alumni loyalty flows in both directions, as it should, and children of graduates are often spectacular applicants, HOWEVER, advantaged admission for legacy applicants should be capped at a set quota, with only the most competitive within that pool admitted. Those not so admitted should join the regular applicant pool with no earmark for legacy status.

Finally, for a holistic reset of the entire process, students should not apply to college until they have been out of high school for one year, and should not begin college until two years after graduation. This puts the application process into the students’ hands and allows for more mature and focused applicants who are really ready to go to college and study (as opposed to party). It also makes parents less central, less involved, and hopefully less competitive.

“Fair” is a malleable concept, in this as in most settings. People who bemoan the “brokenness” of college admissions must understand that the system, implemented by well meaning, usually very idealistic, human beings in a constantly shifting social and cultural landscape, are doing their best to fulfill their responsibilities to the institutions they serve. The vast majority of applicants are hugely qualified, and no matter how decisions are made, deserving and capable young people of every conceivable ethnicity and background will still be rejected. No adjustments to the process will ever change that fact.

Those are my thoughts.